04 May

What is the role of journalists as facilitators for their employers in influencing society?

It is essential to understand Securitisation Theory, which was initially developed to address terrorism as an existential threat to a country's citizens, and its relationship with Framing Theory. Framing (by journalists) is one of the key components in implementing Securitisation Theory to mitigate terrorist threats identified and isolated by the state intelligence securitisation apparatus (SISA). These two theories illustrate the connection between business (framing) and government (SISA), which led to the exploitation of “freedom of speech”, in order to introduce the root causes of lawlessness.

During apartheid, the government viewed terrorism as a state intelligence priority. No stone was left unturned in dealing with terrorist activities during apartheid; the standard rule of law did not apply. This led to the establishment of SISA, which implemented extra-legal operations to combat terrorism, which was justified by the securitisation theory.

In South Africa, the execution of these outside-the-law operations manifested as hit squads. Vlakplaas and CCB Region 6 (inside South Africa) were supposed to be SISA operations. In reality, they were used to eliminate those undermining the transition operations, which started in 1983. Their exposure was carefully framed to distract from the objectives of the new securitisation agendas. The distraction was framed to protect the criminal networks developed by SISA within businesses and the ANC for additional reach. The securitisation and Framing theories have been allowed to continue functioning without the threat of terrorism. The laws used to combat terrorism have been misused for other nefarious purposes, rendering them inapplicable to the elites. All indications are that conglomerates took over the role of SISA for self-gratification.

Since the 9/11 terrorist attack, every continent has been involved in SISA's outside-the-law operations. The law has become irrelevant for those fighting terrorism.  Terrorism has served as the excuse that allowed businesses to implement the one-world economic order agenda through securitisation networks. Securitisation apparati is used by companies to justify profiteering agendas, blaming incompetent governance. Incompetent governance was the result of deployments influenced by businesses since 1994. Businesses commercialised state securitisation operating outside the law, WITHOUT ANY OVERSIGHT, after the fake COVID-19 lockdown initiated the next phase of the Great Reset, which benefits companies affiliated with the World Economic Forum (WEF) objectives.

How did conglomerates introduce the lawlessness agenda to contribute to other profiteering agendas? Businesses are rolling out their greedy strategies using the media to establish the threat and provide their solution. No one else is allowed in this inner circle. The Competition Commission is acting against these corporations that try to capitalise on lawlessness and misery in societies they created. What a cheek!  

It is nothing but greed, and in conjunction with inequality before the law, these businesses often frame the root causes of lawlessness. Corporations deliberately create lawlessness to introduce the one-world economic reset agenda.

The unholy trinity in South Africa is defined as:

• rogue philanthropists (also referred to as White Minority Capital) advancing the undemocratic agendas of the one-world economic order,
• rogue ex-state intelligence securitisation apparati (SISA) working with career criminals framing agendas to legitimise their illegal activities (to justify the war on terror) and
• ex-apartheid spies (mostly false-flag) deployed as political/economic elites acting as agents of influence for the private sector inside liberation movements (ANC).

Treason definition: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/treason

Economic sabotage: Economic sabotage 'taking the country back' – SOC chief executives | SAnews

Understanding a criminal enterprise: What is a criminal enterprise? - Military Modelling

AI describes stakeholder capitalism as:

“Stakeholder capitalism is an untested economic system or philosophy in which businesses prioritise the interests of all their stakeholders—not just shareholders (owners or investors)—when making decisions. In addition to shareholders, stakeholders include employees, customers, suppliers, local communities, the environment, and society. The idea is that companies should create long-term value for all these groups rather than focusing solely on maximising short-term profits for shareholders, which is often associated with traditional shareholder capitalism.

Stakeholder capitalism encourages businesses to consider broader social and environmental impacts. For example, a company might invest in sustainable practices, improve employee working conditions, or support community projects, even if these choices don’t immediately boost stock prices. The concept gained traction as a response to criticisms of unchecked capitalism, like inequality, environmental degradation, and corporate scandals.

It’s often linked to figures like Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum, who popularised it through initiatives like the "Davos Manifesto" in 1973 and later updates. Critics argue it’s vague, prone to corporate PR spin (like greenwashing), or even a step toward centralised control if governments or elites push it too hard. Supporters say it’s a necessary evolution to make capitalism more inclusive and sustainable.”

Effects of elitism:

1. Unemployment
2. SME closure
3. Inequality
4. Presidency breaking the law.
5. SME collapse
6. High unemployment
7. Eskom sabotaged and privatised.
8. Denel is in the process of being privatised
9. ISCOR privatised and closed down
10. Prasa is in the process of being privatised
11. SAA is in the process of being privatised
12. Telkom in process to be privatised
13. SABC collapsed
14. Transnet is dead.
15. Petro SA is dead.
16. The Post Office collapsed.
17. The land bank is ineffective.
18. Johannesburg has collapsed.
19. Bloemfontein had collapsed 
20. Durban has collapsed.
21. Intelligence collapsed
22. SANDF imploding.
23. Judiciary imploding.
24. NPA cronyism.
25. The Hawks haven’t prosecuted any Mafia structures
26. SAPS lost detective capacity, and private security is taking over-who is more corrupt?

Introducing the SCS model from China- solution introduced by elites in alignment with the WEF

1. High-speed fibre
2. 5G
3. Going Cashless
4. Social credit score
5. Digital ID
6. Surveillance-Camera rollout
7. Universal basic income (UBI)
8. Open borders

02 May

What role does the media play in framing the one-world economic reset?

The transition from apartheid to the unbanning of liberation movements in 1990 and the first democratic elections in 1994 in South Africa would not have occurred without the media's framing agendas. Collaboration with the private sector and state intelligence services allowed the media to act as an influencer since apartheid, becoming the foundation for democracy today.

Journalists shape strategies for their owners, businesses, and shareholders. Many journalists (identified) act as messengers for state intelligence securitisation apparati (SISA). The perception of a Mafia State and rampant crime are part of coordinated agendas. Because of this relationship, journalists appear unassailable.

Media framing activities use fearmongering, deception, distortion, justification, fake news, gaslighting, character assassinations, and justification for the selective application of the law, which has become standard practice. More recently, journalists have been framing the one-world economic reset agenda for philanthropists who want to introduce the Great Reset with foreign shareholders. Media houses have demonstrated their willingness to accept the undemocratic one-world economic reset and enforce the agenda on behalf of their shareholders.

COVID-19 exposed these media houses' darker side, using framing tactics that negatively impacted journalistic credibility (few people submitted to their pro-vaccination agenda). Every aspect of the World Economic Forum's (WEF) Great Economic Reset is a lie. The closing of SMES, Gini Coefficient, unemployment, privatisation of SOES and out-of-control lawlessness provide ample evidence.

The modern world cannot hide secrets anymore, as access to instant information makes it almost impossible for philanthropists to deceive society with lies using mass media. The truth is easily accessible, and the lies framed by journalist can be mitigated; this results in mainstream media losing their ability to sway public opinion.

Journalists introduced self-regulation, objectivity, and independence to protect themselves, crying blue murder in outrage when there was only a hint of holding them accountable, further illustrating the degradation of journalistic ethics. Established media houses are closing down as a result.

There is a strong correlation between tactics deployed by the unholy trinity, with its origins in apartheid transition framing agendas of the 1980s, and media using journalists trying to legitimise the one-world economic “Great Reset” of the WEF.

In addition, all media houses worldwide drive the same agenda, contributing to lawlessness and protecting the political elite created by questionable actors associated with the unholy trinity. South African journalists are promoting foreign nefarious objectives to undermine the constitution. Journalists who serve as framing agents on behalf of philanthropists, shareholders, and agents of influence, and who work with legal securitisation structures, should not be allowed to justify illegal profiteering agendas.

The media's agendas offer all the necessary evidence of rogue operations by the unholy trinity for authorities. Failure to act will constitute High Treason, as SISA must protect society against business opportunists attacking the constitution of South Africa, working with foreign businesses.

30 April

Where are the instructions for the one-world economic reset coming from? Final

The Trinity in South Africa has had a historical relationship with the Bilderberg Group since the late 1960s. The Bilderberg Group aims to enhance and protect the economic interests of Western Europe and North America and, therefore, can influence, making it perfect for sanctions-busting operations (profiteering). This ability to influence was extended with the deployment of Klaus Schwab as the executive chair of the World Economic Forum (WEF), whom Henry Kissinger coached on behalf of the Bilderberg Group.

The instructions for a one-world economic reset did not originate from South African businesses. The unholy trinity (see definition below) in South Africa works with foreign influencers of the Great Reset, and corporate social investment (CSI) is the proof. The one-world economic reset in South Africa is carried out primarily by former apartheid collaborators positioned by the private sector as the economic and political elites post-1990. In this process, ex-apartheid strategists guide ex-collaborators within think tanks acting as agents of influence, “advising” the ANC government to act per predetermined outcomes (Operation Vulindlela is seemingly such an example). The government post-1994 (most were deployed because they were ex-apartheid securitisation influencers) follows business instructions.

The Great Reset, as proposed by the WEF, does not address inequality in any of its manifestations. However, the mechanisms (inequality before the law and greed) used to introduce the Reset significantly contribute to lawlessness. Companies involved in the Reset contribute considerably to unemployment, crime, inequality, and flawed digitalisation implementation.

BlackRock and Vanguard's shareholdings include many Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) companies, seemingly laying the groundwork for compliance with the one-world economic reset agenda. The World Economic Forum's (WEF) “great reset” would not have been accepted by companies affiliated with it without the approval of the shareholders of BlackRock and Vanguard.

Modern securitisation networks attempt to revitalise and mitigate historical state securitisation structures to exert influence within societies to accept the one-world economic reset agenda. However, most participants don’t have a clear picture of historical variables before 1994, as critical interventions to become successful are omitted. Strategies cannot work with this emptiness of understanding how the problems of the past were dealt with.

The unbundling of apartheid networks has its roots in these interrelationships involving messy historical variables that used to be mitigated by securitisation apparati. These relationships were so complex that carriers of the secrets decided that it would be better to take these skeletons to their graves.

The state intelligence apparatus should investigate whether any nefarious activity might have occurred during foreign shareholders' attempts to force JSE-listed companies to undermine the Constitution and implement the Great Reset. Agendas such as gun-free, surveillance, open borders, cashless, security estates, digitalisation of data, collapse of Eskom, water, transport infrastructure and warehousing should be the focus of investigations. It all originates from the same place! It all required the use of apartheid collaborators (the new elites) deployed by the private sector after 1990 to be implemented.

27 April

Where are the instructions for the one-world economic reset coming from? Part Five

South Africa's biggest threat is from business intelligence networks working with the World Economic Forum (WEF) as influencers and agents of influence within South Africa, mitigating ex-apartheid collaborators. Authorities should scrutinise these shareholders as influencers who undermine the Constitution and use lawlessness as a tool for economic sabotage to achieve the objectives reflected in Operation Vulindlela.

The WEF is a global congregation of CEOs and business leaders. BlackRock and Vanguard are the majority shareholders in many of these companies, and the WEF's introduction of the one-world economic reset would not have been possible without their patronage. Understanding the nature of relationships between BlackRock and Vanguard as shareholders within the companies attending Davos is critical.

China is Klaus Schwab's champion, and its social credit system (SCS) is recognised as one of the country's most remarkable achievements. The Chinese Communist Party is leveraging the South African Communist Party (SACP) to influence liberation movements to introduce the SCS, see the screenshot below.

Africanism seems revived with guidance from the Chinese Communist Party (backed by the WEF to counter BRICS) to steer influencers within the ANC to achieve SCS. The COVID-19 lockdown was used as a trigger by Fikile Mbalula, the then Minister of Transport, to pilfer the rail infrastructure with the assistance of organised crime networks, which constituted terrorism/sabotage (see the screenshots below). FM was subsequently protected and deployed (who is receiving the surveillance contracts “to fight crime”) as the ANC's Secretary General (SG). China seems to be the preferred frontrunner in introducing a new rail network. However, the GNU wants to bring companies from the EU to reintroduce a new rail network.

This pattern was repeated with Eskom's "collapse", which enabled the introduction of Independent Power Producers (IPP); it involved highly organised crime networks committing sabotage seemingly associated with the terrorist networks linked to liberation movements in Africa. The SG shielded ex-apartheid collaborators within the ANC. The state intelligence securitisation apparatus protects the culprits, with the blessing of the private sector.

The DA is fast-tracking the implementation of the digital ID along with ex-apartheid collaborators in the ANC, as it will enable a cashless system that could be linked to UBI.

For SCS to be successfully implemented in South Africa, it must roll out high-speed fibre (Vumatel/Remgro) and 5G (Rain), which is necessary for a surveillance state (Vumacam/Bidvest). Digitalisation (GNU) of IDs is required for a social credit score (ANC) to introduce a cashless system (banks reducing ATMs), and to introduce a universal basic income (UBI) grant (SACP). These goals were included in the Operation Vulindlela objectives created post the fake COVID-19 plandemic.

The Protection of Personal Information (POPI) Act is another oxymoron used by the private sector to allow the implementation of draconian surveillance agendas, for example, at "security estates," with security companies having access to government databases (AARTO Act and Home Affairs). Crime is used as the catalyst, but the system targets law-abiding citizens. The owners of these new systems are listed companies that own and privatise government databases.